This website about accounting is based on the premise that the accounting trails have to be exposed, that the accountants and not their clients should do it, and that the accounting trails trump everything. The accountants should be able to expose their accounting trails behind any of the items at Bk456p191. I apologize if I am insulting your inteligence but it's been nineteen years now, and if you do not share this belief this website will not work for you.
I believe the minimum requirements needed to recognize the accountant's patterns are to recognize:
(1) That the fundamental issue is where did the money go. The rest is cover. Confusion is cover. Confusion should be recognized as a flag to see what is behind it.
(2) The concept of accounting entanglements. The simplest example of what I am calling an accounting entanglement is the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97. An accounting entanglement is used as a wedge and a takeover tool and as cover. Who ever controls the accounting entanglement controls the people and assets that are entangled. The patterns of creating accounting entanglements are not intended to be recognized but if you can recognize the patterns in this simple example you can recognize the same patterns in the more complicated examples. The amount of money used in the accounting entanglement is not the issue. The small amounts make the numbers appear insignificant and not worthy of attention when the issue is assumed to be the amounts. The issue is not the amounts, the issue is that they are accounting entanglements. One measure of the significance of accounting entanglements such as 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 is the the degree that the accountants go to not recognize it. All the notes at Bk467p191 address small numbers and all are accounting entanglements except note 3. These accounting entanglements make the accounting at Bk467p191 impenetrable.
(3) That judgements should be made on the evidence and not assumptions. Try to avoid assumptions, try to withhold judgment until you see the evidence. The evidence is in exposing the accounting trails and not power. Please look at the differences between the Trustee's actual 12th account and Commissioner Jesse Wilson report of it to the Judges. Does the Commissioner misrepresent the trustee and the trustee's 12th account? If so, in how many ways?
(4) The pattern "2agendas"
(5) The pattern "$545,820"
(6) The pattern "12report"
