Test 659

1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97

The accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 is a good reality test because it is by far the simplest accounting entanglement. If someone is confused about the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 you have to wonder why. When I'm stuck and am thinking "Could this really be true?", I think of 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 and go down a check list. After a while I only have to ask myself "Does 1,475.97 less 816.00 equal 659.97?", and it all comes back.

From Bk467p192:

"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  ......................................... 816.00 "
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ...................................... 659.97 "

(1) Does 1,475.97 minus 816.00 equal 659.97?

(2) Is the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 the accounting trail behind these two items at Bk467p192?

(3) Do the accountants who created these two items and reported these two items and approved these two items not recogonize the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 or any accounting trails for these two items?

(4) If you did not know the accounting entanglement trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 before talking to the accountants would you know it after talking with them?

(5) Why would Commissioner Jesse Wilson close the Trust accounting when I ask about the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97?

(6) Did Joanne Barnes did the accounting for the trust for 1991? Why is it not recognized?

(7) Did Edward White report a "Debt from Harold O'Connell Trust   659.97" on or before April 22, 1992, before asking me what the numbers meant on May 19, 1992?

1992.04.22 (Edward White to innocent Jean Nader, enclosure, in part)
"Debt from Harold O'Connell Trust   659.97" 

1992.05.19   (Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, in part)
"2. The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?"

(8) Did the accountants create the accounting entanglement 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97? Why are they making it appear as if I did?

(9) Do the accountants who created, reported, and approved the accounting entanglement 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 not recognize this accounting trail or any accounting trail for these numbers?

(10) Do the accountants make it appear that the family [Anthony O'Connell] created 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97"

(11) Is it impossible for the family [Anthony O'Connell] to get the accountants to correct the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97?

(12) Is it impossible for the family [Anthony O'Connell] to get the accountants to recognize the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 or any accounting trail for these numbers?

(13) Are the numbers 659.97 and 816.00 missing from the accountant's spreadsheets?

(14) Have the numbers in the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 previously been approved?

The $1,475.97 item was approved by Jesse Wilson on October 4, 1993:
"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... ... ... ... $ 1,475.97" (Book 480 page 1768)

The $816. 00 and the $659.97 items were approved by Jesse Wilson on March 20, 1993:
"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  ......................................... 816.00 "(Book 467 page 192)
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ...................................... 659.97 "(Book 467 page 192)

(15) Is it not recognized that the numbers in the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 had previously been approved?

(16) Was the trustee's 12th trust account asking Jesse Wilson and Henry Mackall for help about accounting entanglements and 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 not recognized?

(17)Had the 12th and 13th court accounts previously been declared delinquent and then the 11th account made a final account?

(18) Have delinquency fees and recording fees for the 12th court account previously been paid and accepted?

(19) Is the actual 12th account and the description of it in the Report to the Judges different? How different?

(20) Are there two contradictory paper trails describing the 659.97?

(21) Which paper trail would you find in the records?

(22) If the Report to the Judges means a Judge has to approve it; how much time would a Judge need to verify what he is being told is true?

(23) Does the 659.97 entangle the trust and the estate on the records of the Court. the State, and the IRS?

(24) Was the court accounting for the Trust closed against the trustee's intent?

(25) If you researched the records today would it appear that the family [Anthony O'Connell], rather than Jesse Wilson, closed the accounting for the trust?

(26) Why would confusion and conflict ever be a justification to not follow an accounting trail rather than a flag to see what is behind it?

(27) Were Exceptions to the Commisioner's report for the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell, fiduciary #49160, filed and recorded on June 16, 1994? Is it not recognized?

(28) Were Exceptions to the Commisioner's report for the Trust u/w of H. A. O'Connell, fiduciary #21840, filed and recorded on August 23, 2000? Is it not recognized?

(29) Does the family have any control over 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97?

(30) If you trust the accountant's and accept, repeat, or carry out their instruction's, are you, rather than the accountants, made to appear responsible?

(31) Is it impossible to stop the accountants from picturing the family as the source of the accounting entanglements?

(32) Has an element hijacked the power and prestige of power centers?

(33) Do the accountants kill the messenger rather than exposing the accounting trails?

(34) (Reafirm). Does 1,475.97 minus 816.00 equal 659.97?

Reality test

(Recognize setups)