Can we expose bk467p191?       Where did the money go?      

       

 

Anthony O'Connell
2005 thru 2007

2005

1995.01.17   (Anthony O'Connell to Edward White) (Copy to Jean Nader, Judge Bruce Bach, Commissioner of Accounts and the Virginia Bar)
"My copy of a letter from the Virginia Department of Taxation does not list you as being responsible for the pension payments due the estate.
Would you please send me some clear and convincing evidence as to whether you have, or whether you have not, accepted this responsibility in your capacity as co-executor?
A recent Washington Post article states that 371 claims have been rejected because they were not signed properly. The instructions for signing were, in part: If the estate is open, the personal representative must file the affidavit and the claim on behalf of the decedent's estate.
This is my third request to you.
If your justification for withholding this information is that I am represented by counsel, I am not represented by counsel. If your justification is that the estate is closed, the estate has never been closed (enc. 1). If you have some other justification for withholding this information, please let me know what that is, in order that it may be addressed.
Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell "

 

2005.01.20   11:26am   (Anthony O'Connell to Andy Somerville)
"Happy New Year to you also.
My home phone number is (928) 204-2942. I do not have a cell phone.
Tony"

 

2005.02.01   8:40am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"Yes, I received the draft contract, and thank you.
For reasons too numerous to mention (again), I haven't yet had time to respond, but I surely will.
Tony"

 

2005.02.11   6:46pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville) (Copy to Anthony O'Connell)
"Thank you for your sales contract.
This is my situation. My sisters, who have an interest in Accotink, are under the influence of advisors who make money disappear. My sisters do not understand that they are being used to make money disappear. The advisors who make money disappear have destroyed my credibility with my sisters. I doubt if I could get my sisters to sign any document that I asked them to sign. The Seller for Accotink has to be the Trustee for Accotink, Anthony M. O'Connell, and no other.
I know people will not believe this. I know people will not believe this until some power decides to actually find out where the money went in my mother's estate (Fiduciary number 49160). I do not have the power. I have been trying since 1992. This is the situation.
Normal procedures will not work here. The only hope for a successful Accotink sale is:
(1) That the Seller for Accotink be the Trustee for Accotink, Anthony O'Connell, and no other.
(2) That the Buyer do a thorough title search on Accotink before entering into a sales contract. The purpose of doing the title search before the sales contract is to determine if the Buyer is comfortable with the Seller for Accotink being the Trustee for Accotink and no other. A suggested start is the information 1 emailed you.
I cannot knowingly allow the advisors an opening in Accotink. I cannot knowingly allow the advisors to use innocent family members again. I cannot depend on getting signatures from my sisters. The-Seller for Accotink has to be the Trustee for Accotink, Anthony M. O'Connell, and no other.
I cannot allow what happened in our first sale (which was certainly not the Buyer's fault) to happen again. Please see the attachment "Sale1988".
Tony"

 

2005.02.14   8:02pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville) (Copy to Anthony O'Connell)
"A title search would be a wonderful test to show that normal procedures will work not here.  I bet you $100 (if betting is not illegal) that a title search on Accotink, leaving no questions unanswered, would be impossible to complete in ten (10) weeks.
History suggests that it would not be prudent for me to enter into a sales contract on Accotink before the potential Buyer has completed a title search on Accotink.
Tony"

 

2005.02.15   3:53pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville) (Copy to Anthony O'Connell)
"Great!
Tony"

 

2005.02.22   3:37pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch)
"Thanks for the update.
Tony"

 

2005.03.16   3:48pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"Thank you so much for having a title search done on Accotink. I can't tell you how much.
Is this the same Stewart Title with website www.stewart.com and headquartered in Houston, Texas?
Am I correct that Stewart Title recognizes Anthony O'Connell, Trustee, as the one and only party to contract for and convey Accotink? Am I correct that Stewart Title recognizes that Anthony O'Connell, Trustee, and no other, is the Seller for Accotink?
Is it possible for me to get a copy of Stewart Title's work on Accotink and ask them some questions? My goal is to do everything I can to prevent title related problems later. I understand that this work is your property.
Tony"

 

2005.03.17   7:02am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch)
"I look forward to seeing the Title report and I thank you for sending me a copy.
Tony"

 

2005.03.18   9:35am   (Anthony O'Connell to Kevin Greenlief)
"The Fairfax County website shows that the 2005 assessment for tax map 90-01-0017 was increased, but I did not receive a reassessment notice.
(1) Did you send out a 2005 reassessment notice for tax map 90-04-01-1117?
(2) If so, who did you send it to?
Thank you."
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee for parcel 90-04-01-0017 (DELETE ALL OR PART OF THIS?  I THINK DELETE ALL, BUT WAIT AND THINK

 

2005.03.18   6.28pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Linda Mellott)
"That is the correct address but I did not receive a 2005 reassessment notice for tax map  90-04-01-0017.  Would you please send another?
Thank you."

 

2005.03.19   3:42pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"Thank you for calling. I haven't received the FEDEX package yet. I assume it will get here soon and 1 will get back to you if I have any questions. 1 very much appreciate you sending me the Title search material.
Tony"

 

2005.03.20   12:26pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch)
"If you give me the FEDEX tracking number I can also tract it fiom here.
Tony"

 

2005.03.21   12:15pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch)
"I received your regular mail today in the white envelope.
The $100 check is for my bet that you could not get a title search done in ten weeks.
Thanks for emailing the revised contract. I believe email is the best form of communication.
Tony"

 

2005.03.25   6:14am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville) (Copy to Anthony O'Connell)
"Thank you for having a title search done and for sending me a copy.
History suggests that it would be prudent to do a title search before signing a contract. I wanted the title company to:
(1) Determine exactly who is the Seller
(2) Expose and describe any potential problem with the title.
(3) Describe exactly what would have to be done to correct any potential problem with the title.
(4) Not find surprises later.
I'm sure you already know this, and I apologize if I am insulting your intelligence, but I want to reference West Business Law, 6th edition, pages 1014 -1015, for their description of a title examination (highlights in red are mine):
"Title Examination. After the sales contract has been negotiated, the buyer or the buyer's attorney (or the escrow agent, title insurance company, or lending institution from which the purchase price is borrowed) performs a title examination. This entails examining at the county recording office the history of all past transfers of, liens on, and sales of the property in question.
A contract for a sale of land includes the seller b implied obligation to transfer marketable title. Marketable title is title that is free from encumbrances (such as mortgages and restrictive covenants, both of which are discussed below), defects in the chain of title (such as a previous sale of the property by the seller), and other events that affect title (such as adverse possession and eminent domain, both of which are discussed below). Title is considered marketable even if the property is subject to zoning restrictions or public easements, such as sidewalks and sewers. If a title examination uncovers a material defect that has not been disclosed in the contract, the seller is considered to have breached the contract, and the buyer may seek any appropriate remedies (damages, rescission, or specific performance with a price adjustment).
Title examinations are not foolproof and buyers of real property generally purchase title insurance to protect their interests in the event that some defect in the title was not discovered during the examination. A title insurance policy insures against loss resulting from any defects in the title and guarantees that if any defects do arise, the title company issuing the policy will defend the owner's interests and pay all legal expenses involved".
Would you be willing to answer some questions about Stewart Title's title search and Commitment for Title Insurance?
Question 1 (a thru e):
Stewart Title's Schedule A, item 4, states in part:
"AND BEING Deed in Trust under Land Trust Agreement recorded in Deed Book 8307 at page 1446, (Also see Power of Attorney and Land Trust Agreement recorded in Deed Book 8845 at Pages 1444 and 1449, respectively.)"
All .three of these above mentioned documents are signed by "Anthony Miner O'Connell , Trustee under the Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell ".
But deed book 7005 at page 0634, states in part:
"Where as by Deed of Partition recorded in Deed Book 4026 at Page 454, the property was reconveyed to Harold A. O'Connell as an undivided one-half interest and to Jean M O'Connell , as to an undivided one-half interest, whereas, Harold A. O'Connell died testate May 26, 1975, and by his last Will and Testament recorded in Will Book 201 at page 96, devised his interest to his executor Anthony M. O'Connell, Trustee, could not qualify and Herbert A Higham, Trustee, was appointed to act in his place and stead "
If "Anthony Miner O'Connell , Trustee under the Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell ", could not qualify as Trustee under the Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, then the three documents mentioned in Stewart Title's item 4 would be invalid. It is essential for Stewart Title to determine if Anthony O'Connell did or did not qualify as Trustee under the Will of Harold A. O'Connell.
(a) Would Stewart Title please address Book 7005 page 634? It is in the chain of title.
(b) Is it Stewart Title's position that Anthony O'Connell did, or did not, qualify as Trustee under the Will of Harold A, O'Connell?
(c) Does Stewart Title see any conflict with Will Book 201 page 109 still being used in the tax records today as part of the legal description for Accotink?
(d) Is it Stewart Title's position that Will Book 201 page 109 has been superseded, or has not been superseded?
(e) Would Stewart Title please address the Deed of Partition in Deed Book 4026 at Page 454. It is part of the chain of title.
Question 2:
Why does Stewart Title require, in their Schedule B, Section 1, item 7, that Anthony Miner O'Connell sign the deed as an individual?
("7. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed, delivered, and duly filed for record, to wit: A. Deed from ANTHONY MINER O'Connell , TRUSTEE, and ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, INDIVIDUALLY (and spouse(s), if any; Martial status to be recited), to LONG BRANCH PAR7NERS L. L. C., vesting fee simple title to the subject property.")
Question 3:
Stewart Title states in their Schedule B, Section 11, that:
"NOTE: The actual value of the estate or interest to be insured must be disclosed to the Company, and subject to approval by the Company, entered as the amount of the policy to be issued. Until the amount of the policy to be issued shall be determined, and entered as aforesaid, it is agreed that as between the Company, the applicant for this Commitment, and every person relying on this Commitment, the Company cannot be required to approve any such evaluation in excess of $1 00,000.00, and the total liability of the Company on account of this Commitment shall not exceed said amount. "
Why is Stewart Title limiting themselves to $100,000 of liability when the County's assessed value for the property is $726,000, and their client's offer for it is $1,200,000? What is it that "must be disclosed to the Company"? By who? Why would Stewart Title make anyone but themselves accountable for disclosing anything in a title search?
Question 4:
Stewart Title states in their Schedule B, Section 1, item 12, that:
"SETTLEMENT TO BE CONDUCTED BZ STEWART TITLE AND ESCROW INC. OR THIS COMMITMENT IS NULL AND VOID AND CANNOT BE RELIED UPON BY EITHER PARTY."
How would this affect the Seller? Is this saying that Stewart title can put requirements on the Seller?
What legal rights would the Seller be giving up to Stewart Title, if any?
Question 5 (a - e):
(a) Does the property have a clear Title?
(b) If not, what is the problem(s)?
(c) If not, what must be done to correct the problem(s)
(d) Who has the legal right to sell the property?
(e) What level of accountability does Stewart Title accept in a title search?
Sincerely,
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2005.03.27   4:57pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"Happy Easter.
I just saw your last two emails. There were only supposed to be two pdf attachments on my email to you concerning Stewart title. No Notepads attachments were intended.
I have to go to Tucson this evening, about 220 miles away, I'll be back late tomorrow. I'll get back to you.
Tony"

 

2005.03.28   9:57pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch)
"I just got back from Tucson.
Have a wonderful time in Europe with your daughter.
Tony"

 

2005.04.08   12:47pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville) (Copy to Anthony O'Connell)
(Editing note: This email is in response to Bill Lynch's 2005.03.26   2:32pm email which was a response to Anthony O'Connell 's 2005.03.25   6:14am email). 
"Hi Bill and Andy,
This is in response to Bill's email dated March 26, 2005, 2:32 pm (repeated here in large blue text). There is one large pdf file (37 pages at 1.55mb) attached and it is called "Surprisel988"
"Tony -
I got your email and I'm trying to figure out the answers to your questions. But first, there were six attachments to your email, but I was unable to open the "Notepad" documents. The PDF's were fine. Can you resend the others?
Would you please send me a copy of what you received with six attachments? The copy to me included the correct attachments (the two pdf attachments and no other).
Generally speaking, I think you have the power to convey.
However, I also think that from reading the land trust agreement, you have the duty to notify all of the beneficiaries of the trust of your intention to sell the property. "...but no such sale may be made until after reasonable notice thereof is given to all of the Beneficiaries." See Paragraph 4.05 of the Trust Agreement.
I need the Title Company take a clear and accountable position on who the Seller is so that all concerned can rely upon it, before the Seller officially does anything.
Paragraph 7 of the Trust Agreement states that any third party, (i.e.: me or the Title Company) need not look beyond you to the Trust Agreement for authority. We can rely on the Power of Attorney of record. That is why the Title Company says that you can convey. However, I would hate to get involved in a deal that would expose you to suits from your sisters.
The way to avoid suits from (1) the unknown advisors using my sisters, (2) the Buyer, and (3) who knows who else, is to have the Title Company examine everything in the chain of title. This is why I asked for a title search before entering into a contract.
I think it is an even bet that once the Title Company ponders the language in Para. 4.05, they will condition their commitment upon having the signature of all the beneficiaries on the Deed or a resolution authorizing the Trustee to convey.
Why? If you or the Title Company believes that I have done something wrong would you please describe exactly what it is? If any parts of the land trust documents are not straight forward would you please ask the Title Company to point those parts out?
Do you want me to ask them specifically?
At this point my sisters are under the influence of unknown advisors who make money disappear. At this point asking my sisters to determine policy is the equivalent of asking the unknown advisors who make money disappear to determine policy. I need to make this clear. The Buyer needs to understand and respect this. This is why 1 asked for a title search before entering into a contract.
For example, my sisters will forever believe Book 7005 page 634 stating that 1 could not qualify as Trustee under the Will of Harold A. O'Connell is true, until someone in a powerful position of trust, such as a Title Company, exposes it. At this point my sisters will not believe me. What is the Title Company's position on the documents in the chain of title in "Surprisel988"?
(I suspect that just asking the question will invoke a "belt and suspenders" response.)
Regarding the documents of record, basically everything that precedes the conveyance of the property to you and your sisters and subsequently to the Land Trust is rendered moot by the Land Trust Agreement.
All parties with an interest in the property signed the conveyance to the Trust, so the Trust is The Owner. I see no reason to question the validity of the Ownership. I suspect that this is not the information you were hoping to receive, but these are my honest opinions.
I appreciate your opinion but I am relying upon West Business Law, 6th edition, pages 1014 -1015, (Underlines are mine):
"Title Examination. After the sales contract has been negotiated, the buyer or the buyer's attorney (or the escrow agent, title insurance company, or lending institution from which the purchase price is borrowed) performs a title examination. This entails examining at the county recording office the history of all past transfers of, liens on, and sales of the property in question.
A contract for a sale of land includes the seller's implied obligation to transfer marketable title. Marketable title is title that is free from encumbrances (such as mortgages and restrictive covenants, both of which are discussed below), defects in the chain of title (such as a previous sale of the property by the seller), and other events that affect title (such as adverse possession and eminent domain, both of which are discussed below). Title is considered marketable even if the property is subject to zoning restrictions or public easements, such as sidewalks and sewers. If a title examination uncovers a material defect that has not been disclosed in the contract, the seller is considered to have breached the contract, and the buyer may seek any appropriate remedies (damages,
rescission, or specific performance with a price adjustment.
Title examinations are not foolproof, and buyers of real property generally purchase title insurance to protect their interests in the event that some defect in the title was not discovered during the examination. A title insurance policy insures against loss resulting from any defects in the title and guarantees that if any defects do arise, the title company issuing the policy will defend the owner's interests and pay all legal expenses involved".
I need a Title Company to examine everything in the chain of title and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings. I need a title company that will provide straight forward answers with no ambiguity. Answers that everyone concerned can rely upon, answers to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
Once I get the Notepad documents, I can start asking the Title Company about your questions.
Bill"

 

2005.04.29   7:41am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"Bill, welcome back from Europe.
Thank you for initiating a title search on Accotink and for your telephone call on April 28, 2005.
Before-entering into a contract, I need a title search with straight forward information that all concerned can rely upon. I can not emphasize that enough. I need a title search with straight forward information that all concerned can rely upon. If Stewart Title is unclear about any part of my April 8, 2005, questions concerning their Commitment 05001493, would you please ask them to explain what it is?
If you give me your permission and their email address I would be happy to contact them directly.
Tony"

 

2005.04.30   5:18am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"I need a title search on Accotink that provides straight forward information that all concerned can rely upon. I can not emphasize that enough. I need a title company to examine everything in the chain of title and. to take a clear and accountable position on their findings. I need a title company that will provide straight forward answers with no ambiguity to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
If Stewart Title is unclear about any part of my April 8, 2005, questions concerning their Commitment 05001493, would you please ask them to explain what it is? If you give me your permission and their email address I would be happy to contact them directly.
Tony"

 

2005.05.10   8:08am    (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville) (Copy to Anthony O'Connell)
"Thank you for your telephone message on May 9th, and. for returning the title commitment to the title company. Before entering into a contract, I need a title search with straight forward information that all concerned can rely upon. I can not emphasize that enough. I need a title company to examine everything in the chain of title, and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings. I need a title company that will provide straight forward answers with no ambiguity, to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
For these same reasons; to avoid or at least minimize confusion and misunderstandings, would you please communicate with me by email instead of the telephone?
Thank you again for returning the title commitment to the title company.
Tony"

 

2005.05.22   5:46am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch) (Copy to Lisa Overton, Andy Somerville and Steve Blizzard)
"I need a title company that will provide a Title Commitment that is clear and unambiguous. I need a title company to examine everything in the chain of title and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings, so that everyone concerned can rely upon it. I need a title company that will provide answers to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
Tony"

 

2005.05.22   5:51pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard, Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"I need a title company that will do a thorough title search, one that examines everything in the chain of title, and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings, so that everyone concerned can rely upon it.
I need a title company that will provide answers to fundamental questions such as;
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
And to write a Title Commitment that reflects it. 
I need clarity and accountability. Telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x, is not an accountable position.  It is not prudent for me to rely on telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x.
Tony"

 

2005.10.18   (letter) (Anthony O'Connell to Jean Nader and Sheila O'Connell)
"Sheila, congratulations on moving to your new place! What a giant step that was. Carol and I will be visiting Rich in Albuquerque in mid November and hope to see his band play. They played a lot in October.
Jean, thanks for your note and the photo of me holding John when I visited you in Okinawa. I will send you the old photographs I have of our family
I can't tell you how much I want to sell Accotink. But neither of you understand that if I signed a sales contract for Accotink, that under the present conditions, I could not stop money from disappearing. I can not even convince you to find out where the money went in mother's estate.
Since you do not believe me, the situation continues to remain hopeless. Unless at least one of you decides to find out on your own. At least one of you would actually have to find out where the money went in mother's estate. It is common sense. If you do that, I believe you can not help but to begin to discover how it was done, and see the same patterns for Accotink.
Jean, you have to overcome your fear of finding out where the money went in mother's estate. You have to stop doing what the people, who do not what you to find out where the money went, want you to do. You have to actually find out where the money went in mother's estate. It is common sense. Fourteen unsuccessful years of my trying to get some public entity to come in and help suggest that no public entity is going to come in and help. You are intelligent. Please find out who the bad guys actually are. You have to find out, you have to overcome your fear of finding out, you have to stop being used, you have to stop working unwittingly for the people who don't want you to find out where the money went. I believe constant unrelenting stress can ruin a person's health. You do not believe me. You absolutely, positively have to find out on your own, or we all remain trapped is this helpless situation.
Love, Tony"

2006

2006.04.04   (Anthony O'Connell to Jean Nader and Sheila O'Connell)
"Fairfax County's assessed value of Accotink as of January 1, 2006, is $980,000.00.
Conditions continue to exist that make it imprudent for me to enter into a sale contract for Accotink. I believe the probability of my sale of Accotink being taken over by people who control the audit trails and make money disappear, and using Jean as an unwitting front to do it, is approximately 100%.
The take over tools are in place. Unless these conditions can be changed none of us is going to get the proceeds of Accotink. After my death my Trusteeship of Accotink will be transferred to someone who is aware of these conditions. I have tried to get help from within and without the system but it has not worked.
I have had my credibility attacked until my credibility with you has been destroyed. If you look at the correspondence, it will show that the attacks come when I try to expose the audit trails. Audit trails remain secret and we are a destabilized family.
We have to communicate. I have to know who is telling who to do what. Secrecy is an impossible obstacle to overcome. Would you please give me your response to the following?
a) How do you feel that you have not received your money from Accotink?
b) Why do you think I have not entered into a sales contact for Accotink since 1992?
c) Please describe your understanding of my last sale as best you can. If you don't understand what happened in my past sale, how can you understand what is set up to happen in my future sale? If it can't be found where the money went in the takeover of my past sale, what chance is there in a takeover of my future sale of Accotink?
I believe it is fair to say that after thirteen years you are not going to believe me. Please try to expose the audit trails in mother's estate and find out for yourselves. The evidence is in exposing the audit trails, all the audit trails, and nothing but the audit trails. The only solution is in trying to expose the audit trails in mother's estate.
Audit trails have a beginning and an end. They consist of numbers and not words, numbers that logically follow one after the other, from the beginning to the end. If there are gaps or confusion, something is wrong. Every number in accounting has an audit trail.
Every number in the accounting in the court records has an audit trail.
The audit trails in the public court records are not meant to be secret. That is why they are made public. Copies of relevant public court records are enclosed. These are the accounts of the Estate, (inventory in Book 0457 page 0820, first account in Will Book 0467 page 0191, and the second account); and the 1991 account of the Trust, (Book 480 pagel765), prepared by the CPA Firm. I have no control over the CPA Firm who prepared the 1991
Trust Accounts even though I am the Trustee. I have no control over the people who control the audit trails.
A cover for money disappearing is confusing audit trails. People assume that it is their fault when they don't understand audit trails, rather than that the audit trails have been intentionally confused. It is human nature. Confusion is a cover. Confusion stops people from pursuing audit trails. Confusion is a red flag. It is virtual impossible to clear away the confusion. Start with the audit trails because only then can you see through the confusion. Do not accept confusion as an answer.
A cover for money disappearing is creating family conflict. It makes people think the problem is a family issue rather then money disappearing. The appearance of family conflict diverts people from exposing audit trails. Years of conflicts have been put upon us by the people who control the audit trails.
A cover for money disappearing is fear. An example is the lawyer's letter of April 22, 1992, in the Trust's 12th Court Account. It plans dirty tricks accounting to destabilize a family, take over their assets, and make money disappear. Your trust is the only tool they need. Jean would have to do a complete reversal from following the policy of secrecy she has been told to carry out in order to expose the audit trails in mother's estate. This may be an impossible obstacle for Jean to overcome because the last thing the people who control the audit trails will allow to happen is to have their audit trails exposed here. If
Jean does not overcome this obstacle of fear induced secrecy none of us is going to get our money from Accotink.
The simplest example that I can find that shows how things work, is audit trail 1,475.97 -
816.00 = 659.97. Use it as a straight arrow to cut through confusion. If you understand this audit trail you will understand a great deal. One is that the people who created this audit trail won't recognize it, or any audit trail, with 659.97 in it. Please try to figure out why. Then think carefully about whose advice you should rely upon.
From the 1991 Trust Account prepared by the CPA Firm, Book 0480 page 1768, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, on October 4, 1993:
Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... $1,475.97
From the First Estate Account, Will Book 0467 page 0192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, on March 20, 1993:
Int fm Harold 'Connell Trust                                 816.00
Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust                           659.97
It is probable that neither of you will have the time or whatever to make yourself aware of the level of deception that has been put upon us. You can hire outside professionals but you still have to learn enough to know when you are being misled.
What does it mean when the lawyer for the Estate, the CPA Firm, and the Commissioner of Accounts don't recognize the audit trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97, or any audit trail with 659.97in it? Or any audit trails for the accounting conflicts the lawyer asks me about in his letter of May 19, 1992? Do you think it is a good idea, Jean and Sheila, to continue to go to them for advice? We have had thirteen years of secrecy. Secrecy works for the people who control the audit trails and make money disappear. Secrecy does not work for the family.
I will continue to try to find a buyer for Accotink who could be made aware of the existing conditions and not fall for them, but the probability of finding a buyer like this, is as remote now, as it has been in the past.
Sheila, you owe me your share of real estate taxes for 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004, and 2005. Jean, you owe me your share of real estate taxes for 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005. Please make your check payable to "Anthony O'Connell, Trustee". If you decide you want to reimburse me
I will calculate the amounts. If you do reimburse me it would stop the accumulation of the 10% interest on your unpaid balance.
You do not believe what I have been telling you all these years. Please try to expose the audit trails in mother's estate and find out for yourself so I can sell Accotink. Expose the audit trails. Then judge. It is the only solution.
Love, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee
Enclosures (14)" DID I REALLY INCLUDE 14 ENCLOSURES HERE? OR JUST THE THREE?
(Editing note: Please see the reference in pdf to see the 14 enclosures that are not included here)

 

2006.11.10   8:41am   (Anthony O'Connell to Kevin Greenlief)
"Would you please update your records for tax map 0904 01 001 7 to reflect my new address?
Old address:  Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee  45 Skyview Road Sedona. Arizona 86336
New address: Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee 856 Country Club Drive Prescott, Arizona 86303-4061
Thank you."

 

2006.11.14   7:59pm    (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch)
"Nice to hear from you, how are you and your family?
I would like to sell Accotink.  The seller on any future contract or deed for Parcell 0904 01 0017 is Anthony M. O'Connell , Trustee, and no other.
I moved from Sedona to Prescott, Arizona.  This is my new address.
Anthony M. O'Connell , Trustee
856 Country Club Drive
Prescott, Arizona 86303-4061
aoconnell@cableone.net
Tony"

2007

2007.01.01   9:25am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"Happy New Year. I hope you have the kind of year you want.
Did your studies of the 15 acres determine how many townhouses could be built on the 15 acres? Do you know if that was based on a density of PDH-3 or PDH-4 (I can't find a copy of the comprehensive plan map that shows the planned rezoning density)?
Do you know how much it would cost to build the access road; the extension of Thomas Grant Drive?
Tony"

 

2007.02.25   12:27pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"I've been trying to see if there were ways we could make your contract work, but I am afraid we are too far apart.
I believe a fair market price for the 15 acres, as is, is between 1.5 million and 2 million dollars.  I would sell it as is, with no contingencies, for $ 1.75 million.
The buyer would have a 60 day study period during which time the buyer could get out for any reason.
Are we too far apart?
Tony"

 

2007.04.03   5.50am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somverville)
"Bill, how was Key West? I was stationed there in 1966, at the Navy underwater swim school (which isn't there anymore). It was desolate then. I know it has changed dramatically.
The sales contract that you sent me in January of 2007 begins with:
"This Agreement of sale is made and entered into this_ day of January 2007, by and between Long Branch Partners, L.L.C. "Purchaser" and Anthony M. O'Connell , "Seller", all of whom are sometimes hereinafter referred to as "the Parties". ... Witnesseth that: Whereas, Seller is the owner of certain real property ....... etc ..."
Would you please explain this?
Tony"

 

2007.04.03   6.23am   (Anthony O'Connell to buyer)
"The sales contract that you sent me in January of 2007 begins with:
"This Agreement of sale is made and entered into this_ day of January 2007, by and between Long Branch Partners, L.L.C. "Purchaser" and Anthony M. O'Connell , "Seller , all of whom are sometimes hereinafter referred to as "the Parties". ... Witnesseth that: Whereas, Seller is the owner  of certain real property ....... etc. ...."   (underlines mine)
Wou1d you please explain this?
Tony"

 

2007.04.12   3:39am   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard, Lisa Overton, buyer)
"Would you please explain why the sales contract for Accotink of January 2007 says Anthony M. O'Connell is the owner? I need a title company that will do a thorough title search, one that examines everything in the chain of title, and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings, so that everyone concerned can rely upon it. I need a title company that will provide answers to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
And to write a Title Commitment that reflects it. I need clarity and accountability. Telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x, is not an accountable position. It is not prudent for me to rely on telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x.
Thank you."

 

2007.04.12   3:52am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard, buyer)
"Would you please explain why the sales contract for Accotink of January 2007 says Anthony M. O'Connell is the owner? I need a title company that will do a thorough title search, one that examines everything in the chain of title, and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings, so that everyone concerned can rely upon it. I need a title company that will provide answers to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
And to write a Title Commitment that reflects it. I need clarity and accountability. Telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x, is not an accountable position. It is not prudent for me to rely on telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x.
Are you willing to do this?

 

2007.04.13   7.09am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard, buyer)
"I don't understand "Do you mean to say that you want the title company to issue a title insurance policy to you as Trustee? Would you please explain it?
I need a title company that will do a thorough title search, one that examines everything in the chain of title, and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings, so that everyone concerned can rely upon it. I need a title company that will provide answers to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
And to write a Title Commitment that reflects it. I need clarity and accountability. Telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x, is not an accountable position. It is not prudent for me to rely on telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said x.
Tony"

 

2007.05.03   8:08pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch) (Copy to Andy Somverville)
"How were the trout in Pennsylvania?
I want to communicate in writing and not by telephone because writing leaves a record of who said what, so there is less probability of misunderstanding.  What questions of mine are you referring to?
Tony"

 

2007.05.05   6.45pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard, buyer)
"Did you finish your title search for parcel 0904 01 0017? If so, what did you find?
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.05.08   3.39pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard , buyer)
"I received the title report from Lisa Overton at Stewart Title today. Are you saying that this is a title search?
Did you finish your title search for parcel 0904 01 0017? If so, would you please send me a copy of the abstract?
Thank you."

 

2007.05.09   8.51am  (Anthony O'Connell Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard, buyer)
"Before entering into a contract for parcel 0904 01 0017, 1 need the Buyer to do a Title Search that provides straightforward information and accountable answers so that all concerned can rely upon it.
For example, the County currently has the legal description for parcel 0904 01 0017 on the real estate tax records as "ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 DB8307-1446 DB8845-1444 DB8845-1449"
(1) Does Stewart Title see a conflict between WB201 page 109 dated 1975, with the other documents; the Virginia Land Trust documents dated 1992?
(2) Does Stewart Title see the Virginia Land Trust documents dated 1992 as superseding Will Book 201 page 109 dated 19757
(3) What is Stewart Title's response to this legal description?
Thank you"

 

2007.05.12   9.34pm  (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton) (No copy to another)
"I don't understand your abbreviated notation comment. Would you please explain it? Thank you."

 

2007.05.15  1.28pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton) (No copy to another)
"I don't understand your "(3) The County simply uses an abbreviated notation of what the property is for their tax records." in your email of May 11, 2007. Would you please explain? 
Your commitment for title insurance revised 4/24/07, schedule B, section 1, item 7.A says "Deed from ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL TRUSTEE, and ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, INDIVIDUALLY ....". Why is it written this way?
Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.05.17   9.33am  (Anthony O'Connell to buyer) (Copy to Lisa Overton and Steve Blizzard)
"I'm concerned about our communication. For more than two years now I've been under the impression that you were willing to have a title search done on parcel 0904 01 0017 before we sign a sales contract.
I would like to try again. Before I sign a sales contract for parcel 0904 01 0017, I need the Buyer to do a Title search and send me a copy. When I say Title search, I mean a Title search such as that defined in Blacks' Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, as: "Title search. An examination of the records of registry of deeds or other office which contains records of title documents to determine whether title to the property is good; i.e., whether there are any defects in the title. The examiner then prepares an abstract of the documents examined."  
I need a title company that will do a thorough title search, one that examines everything in the chain of title, and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings so that everyone concerned can rely upon it. I need a title company that will provide answers to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
I need clarity and accountability. Telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said this or that, is not an accountable position. It is not prudent for me to rely on telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, or person one saying person two said this or that. 
Are you willing to do this?
Anthony M. O'Connell , Trustee

 

2007.05.23   5.26am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"Does Stewart Title find the following legal description for parcel 0904 01 0017 correct:
"ACCOTTNK STATION WB201 109 DB8307-1446 DB8845-1444 DB8845-1449"?
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.05.24   6.17am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"Does Stewart Title find the following legal description for parcel 0904 01 0017 correct:
"ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 DB8307-1446 DB8845-1444 DB8845-1449"? Please read the documents.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.05.25   6.50am   (Anthony O'Connell to Stewart Title) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"Does Stewart Title find the following legal description for parcel 0904 01 0017 correct:
"ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 DB8307- 1446 DB8845- 1444 DB8845- 1449"? Please read the documents. Please give me a yes or a no.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.05.28   4.42pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Kevin Greenlief) 
"Do you find the following legal description for parcel 0904 01 0017 correct: "ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 DB8307-1446 DBWS1444 DBW5- 1449"? Please read the documents.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee for parcel 0904 01 0017"

 

2007.06.04   7.21.15am   (Anthony O'Connell to Kevin Greenlief)
"Do you find the following legal description in your records for parcel 0904 01 0017 correct: "ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 DB8307-1446 DB8845-lWDB8845-149? Please read the documents. Please give me a yes or a no.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee for parcel 0904 01 0017"

 

2007.06.04   7.21.19am   (Anthony O'Connell to Janet Coldsmith)
"Do you find the following legal description in your records for parcel 090401 0017 correct: "ACCOTINK STATION WR201 109 DB8307-1446 DR8815-1414 DB8845-1449"? Please read the documents. Please give me a yes or a no.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee for parcel 0904 01 0017"

 

2007.06.05   10.08am   (Anthony O'Connell to Julio Vargas) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"Do you think the legal description for parcel 0904 01 0017 has been a factor in the problems I've had in getting a tax bill? Do you find the following legal description for parcel 0904 01 0017 correct: "ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 DB8307-1446 DR8845-1444 DR8845-1449"? Please read the documents.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee for parcel 0904 01 0017"

 

2007.06.12, 11:46am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard)
"The attached copy of Ms. Overton's letter to my mother dated April 22, 1988, shows she handled the settlement for the 1988 sale to Lynch Properties Limited Partnership. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I was surprised to be told the day before settlement of this sale that I had to sign a deed that said I could not qualify as Trustee. Where does it say in the Court records that I could not qualify as Trustee? 1 found six documents that show I qualified as Trustee in 1986. Copies of the six documents and the page from the deed are attached.
Please show me where it says in the Court records that I could not qualify as Trustee. I am concerned that something like this may happen again.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.06.12 (letter) (Anthony O'Connell to Jean Nader and Sheila O'Connell)
"It was nice to talk with you Sunday. After 14 years, I believe the situation we and Accotink have been put in has little chance of getting better and more of a chance of getting worse, especially if one of us dies before the sale of it.
I cannot allow what happened in my 1988 sale to happen again (I know you do not believe I made this sale). The justifications to create conflict and confusion are in place. I do not have the power to remove them. This and other handicaps such as my destroyed credibility with you leaves me no reasonable way to prevent outside interference from being used again, except to sell Accotink with the Seller as Anthony Miner O'Connell, Trustee, with only the Trustee's signature, and not the signatures of the three of us as individuals, be required on the sales documents. The Trust documents provide for the Seller of Accotink to be the Trustee of Accotink and no other. If you would like me to send you copies again, please ask and I will. A down side of this is that most buyers would prefer to have anyone who has any interest in a property to also sign the sales documents, such as the three of us as individuals. But in the situation we have been put in, this will not work.
I also feel it necessary to prevent outside interference by putting a clause in the sales contract that says something such as "The Trustee reserves the right to declare the contract null and void if at any time, in the Trustee's opinion, interference such as that that happened in the last sale, etc., etc., starts to happen". This also is not appealing to a buyer, but in the situation we have been put in, it is common sense.
In short, our choice is that only the Trustee's signature is required on the sales documents or there will be no sale. I believe you will be advised off the record that I am trying to cheat you. I can not stop that. There will be no secrecy about where the money went and you will get your legal share.
I do hope you ask the title company questions such as those I pointed out in several of the enclosures. Please have them speak for themselves and not avoid accountability by having someone else speak for them.
I just finished my web design class and plan to improve my website www.fairfaxl5.com to help market Accotink.
The assessed value of Accotink for 2007 is $1,029,000. I haven't received the real estate tax bill for 2007 yet but they told me on the phone that it was $9,168.39. Please send me a check for your 113 share of $9,168.39, or $3,052.70, made payable to Anthony Miner O'Connell, Trustee. Please do not make it out any other way than to Anthony Miner O'Connell, Trustee.
Sheila, you owe-me your share of the real estate taxes for 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Jean, you owe me your share of the real estate taxes for 1999,2000,2001,2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Please reimburse me for paying your share of the real estate tax. It would save you the 10% interest per year that accrues on your unpaid balance (Please see the attached copy of page 1454 in Book 8845 from our Trust Agreement).
Sincerely,
Anthony Miner O'Connell, Trustee
Enclosures:
1. Interest page
2. Money Disappears
3. Requirement
4. Title Commitment
5. Letter of May 1, 2007
6. Email of June 12, 2007"

 

2007.06.13   7.00am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton and Steve Blizzard)
"Would you please answer these questions?
(1) The attached copy of Ms. Overton's letter to my mother dated April 22, 1988, shows she handled the settlement for my 1988 sale. I was surprised to be told the day before settlement that I had to sign a deed that said I could not qualify as Trustee. The attached six documents show I qualified as Trustee in 1986. Where does it say in the Court records that I could not qualify as Trustee? I am concerned that something similar may happen again.
(2) Does Stewart Title find the following legal description in the real estate tax records for parcel 0904 01 0017 correct: "ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 DB8307-1446 DB8845-1444 DB8845 -1449"? Please read the documents. Please give me a yes or a no.
(3) Why does Stewart Title allow someone not from Stewart Title to respond to questions for Stewart Title?
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee for parcel 0904 01 0017"

 

2007.07.22   10:50am   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville) (Copy to Anthony O'Connell)
"I settled on the sale of 66 acres of my farm in Highland County last week and that is why I haven't gotten back to you sooner. Can you do two things?
(1) Send me a copy of the abstract of the title search for parcel 17?
(2) Remove the "... you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or any attachnent hereto," clause from your emauls? I will not agree to any non-disclosure of information.
Before I sign a sales contract for parcel 0904 01 0017, I need the Buyer to do a Title search and send me a copy of the abstract. When I say Title search, I mean a title search such as that defined in Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, as "Title search. An examination of the records of registry of deeds or other office which contains records of title documents to determine whether title to the property is good; i.e., whether there are any defects in the title. The examiner then prepares an abstract of the documents examined."  
I need a title company that will do a thorough title search, one that examines everything in the chain of title, and to take a clear and accountable position on their findings so that everyone concerned can rely upon it. I need a title company that will provide answers to fundamental questions such as:
(a) Who is the Seller?
(b) Does the property have a clear Title?
(c) If not, why not?
(d) If not, what must be done to correct it?
I need clarity and accountability. Telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, person one saying person two said this or that, is not an accountable position. It is not prudent for me to rely on telephone calls, personal opinions, memos, or person one saying person two said this or that. 
Are you willing to do this?
Tony

WHERE IS MY 2007.07.23   10:51 email? It's most important. Not in pdf reference either. Is this a typo, and I meant 2007.07.22 10:51am?

 

2007.09.12   7:01pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch) (Copy to Andy Somerville)
"As I said before I will not agree to any non-disclosure of information. This means, for example, that I will not respond to any email that has anything like your "... you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or any attachnent hereto," on it.
It's feeling like fall in Highland County
Tony"

 

2007.10.15   9:05 pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton and Steve Blizzard) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"What does "WB201 109 in "ACCOTINK STATION WB201 109 D88307-1446 D88845-1444 068845.1449", mean to you?
Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell "

 

2007.10.16   10:33 am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton and Steve Blizzard)
"Please, what does "WB201 109" in "ACCOTINK STATION WE201 109 DB8307-1446 DB8845-I444 DB8845-1449" mean to Stewart title? Please read the documents.
I need an answer from Stewart Title. Would you please tell Bill Lynch to not answer for you?
Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell "

 

"2007.10.16   10:58 am   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton and Steve Blizzard) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
Please, what does "WE201 109" in "ACCOTINK STATION WE201 109 D88307-I446 D88845-I444 DB8845-1449", mean to Stewart title? Please read the documents.
Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell "

 

2007.10.16   12:01 pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Lisa Overton and Steve Blizzard)
Thank you for responding on behalf of Stewart Title. Please read the documents. What do the contents of these documents mean to Stewart Title?
Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell "

 

2007.10.17   5.42am   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton) (No copy to another)
"What do the contents of WE201 109 mean to Stewart Title?
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.10.25   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton)
"Why would Stewart Title not answer the question ""How do the contents of WE201 109 fit in Stewart Title's title search?"? Please ask Bill Lynch to not answer for you.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.10.31   8.49pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton)
"Why would Stewart Title not answer the question ""How do the contents of WE201 109 fit in Stewart Title's title search?"?
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.12.05   2.16pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton)
"Why would Stewart Title not answer the question ""How do the contents of WB201 109 fit in Stewart Title's title search?"?  I believe it would not be prudent for a Seller to enter into a contract with a Buyer whose Tile company will not answer a straight forward question such as this. 
My new address is: Anthony O'Connell, 439 South Vista Del Rio, Green Valley, Arizona 85614, and my new email address is aocconnell@cox.net.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.12.07   7:23 am   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
Please read WB201 109. How does the content of WE 201 109 fit in Stewart Title's title search for parcel 0904-1-0017? 
Why would Stewart Title consider "I am happy to answer yet again that WB 201 1W is simply one of many documents we review in the chain of title to the properly to decide insurability." an answer? This could be said of any document Stewart Title says is in the chain of tile. The content of the documents differ.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.12.09   9.36am   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"Please read WB201 109. How do the contents of WB 201 109 fit in Stewart Title's title search for parcel 0904-l-0017?  Why would Stewart Title say "I am happy to answer yet again, that WB 201 109 is simply one of many documents we review in the chain of title to the property to decide insurability." an answer? This response could be said of any document Stewart Title says is in the chain of title. The contents of the documents differ.
I would not sign a contract with a buyer who thinks the answer to the question "How do the contents of WB 201 109 fit in Stewart Title's title search for parcel 0904-0140177" is  "I am happy to answer yet again, that WE 201 109 is simply one of many documents we review in the chain of title to the property to decide insurability." an answer.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.12.13   8.45am   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"Please ask Bill Lynch to not speak for Stewart Tile.
How do the contents of WB 201 109 fit in Stewart Title's title search for parcel 0904-01-0017? Why would Stewart Title say "I am happy to answer yet again, that WB 201 109 is simply one of many documents we review in the chain of title to the property to decide insurability."? The same could be said of any document Stewart Title says is in the chain of title. The contents of the documents differ. Please read WB201 109. It would not be prudent to contract with a buyer who does not understand the importance of this.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.12.19   5.26pm   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
"I have asked you numerous times to explain how WB 201 109 fits in with your title search on parcel 0904-01-0017. Your latest reply was "I am happy to answer yet again, that WB 201 109 is simply one of many documents we review in the chain of title to the property to decide insurability." This reply does not answer the question. This reply says you review WB 201 109. Please answer the question.  Your client asks me why I ask this question. The question should be why does Stewart Title not answer the question. It would not be prudent to contract with a buyer who does not understand this.
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

 

2007.12.28   8.55am   (Anthony O'Connell to Steve Blizzard and Lisa Overton) (Copy to Bill Lynch and Andy Somerville)
Please ask Andy Somerville to not speak for Stewart Title.
I have asked Stewart Title numerous times to explain how WB 201 109 (Will of H.A O'Connell) fits in with their title search on parcel 0904-01-0017. Stewart Title's latest reply was "I am happy to answer yet again, that WB 201 109 is simply one of many documents we review in the chain of title to the property to decide insurability."
This reply does not answer the question. This reply says Stewart Title reviews WB 201 109. Please answer the question.   What happened during my April 21, 1986, sale of parcel 0902-01-0085 when Stewart Title did the title search and was the settlement agent? Did Stewart Title say or imply that I was not qualified as Trustee under the Will of H.A. O'Connell?
Anthony O'Connell , Trustee"

2008